The field · hardware
Hardware scoreboard
Physical qubit counts are a marketing number. The metrics that predict a useful machine are logical qubits, gate fidelity, and how logical error falls with code distance. Results below are tagged by what they are.
- Verified — published result
- Vendor-reported result
- Projection — roadmap target
- Opinion — named, dated
- Estimate — with caveats
- Contested — disputed in the record
- Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed
Three different sentences
- ✓ achievedBelow-threshold error correction — Google Willow (Nature, 2025); Harvard/QuEra 448-atom architecture (Nature, 2026).
- ✓ achievedLogical qubits beating physical qubits — Microsoft/Quantinuum 800× (2024); Willow memory 2.4× beyond break-even (2025); Helios (2025).
- ✗ not yetA fault-tolerant machine solving useful problems — Not achieved as of 2026-08-21. Every vendor target above is dated 2027 or later.
Milestones, 2023–2026
Chronological. A vendor blog is a real source for what a vendor measured — it is not peer review, and the tag says so.
Google Willow: below-threshold surface-code error correction
Verified — published resultA 105-qubit superconducting processor ran surface-code memories at distance 3, 5 and 7. Each step of +2 in code distance suppressed the logical error rate by Λ = 2.14 ± 0.02; the distance-7 code reached 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle with real-time decoding. The logical memory also beat break-even, outliving the processor's best physical qubit by 2.4 ± 0.3×.
Microsoft + Quantinuum: logical qubits 800× better than physical
Vendor-reported resultFour logical qubits encoded in 30 trapped-ion physical qubits on Quantinuum's H2, with a logical error rate reported 800× lower than the physical rate and more than 14,000 circuit trials without an uncorrected error. The first widely cited demonstration that encoded qubits can beat the raw qubits they are built from.
Microsoft + Quantinuum: 12 entangled logical qubits
Vendor-reported resultTwelve logical qubits created and entangled on H2 with the same 800× single-qubit improvement, and a 22× circuit-error improvement over the corresponding physical circuit when all twelve were entangled.
Harvard / MIT / QuEra: 48 logical qubits on neutral atoms
Verified — published resultA reconfigurable neutral-atom processor ran algorithms on up to 48 logical qubits with hundreds of logical gates — the first logical-qubit demonstration at that scale — using 280 physical atoms and error-detecting codes.
Harvard / MIT / QuEra: 448-atom fault-tolerant architecture, 96 logical qubits, below threshold
Verified — published resultAn integrated architecture on 448 atomic qubits combining the essential elements of fault-tolerant computation and demonstrating below-threshold error suppression; reported as 96 logical qubits using high-rate [[16,6,4]] codes, published in Nature in January 2026.
Quantinuum Helios: 98 physical qubits, 99.921% two-qubit fidelity, 48 error-corrected logical qubits at 2:1
Vendor-reported resultHelios launched with 98 fully connected trapped-ion qubits, 99.921% average two-qubit gate fidelity and 99.9975% single-qubit fidelity. Three distinct logical results were reported — read the distinctions carefully: 94 error-*detected* logical qubits entangled in a GHZ state (~1:1 encoding, Iceberg code); 50 error-detected logical qubits at better-than-break-even; and 48 error-*corrected* logical qubits at a 2:1 physical-to-logical ratio via code concatenation.
Microsoft Majorana 1: the topological-qubit claim is disputed
Contested — disputed in the recordMicrosoft announced a processor with eight 'topological' qubits by press release. The accompanying Nature paper stopped short of demonstrating a topological qubit, and Nature's editorial note stated the results 'do not represent evidence for the presence of Majorana zero modes'. A peer-reviewed challenge by Henry Legg (St Andrews) was later published in Nature alongside Microsoft's rebuttal. Status: not a verified logical-qubit result.
Roadmaps — promises with dates
None of these has happened. They are listed because they are the claims the industry will be measured against, and because their spread — IBM's 200 logical qubits in 2029 against IonQ's 80,000 in 2030 — is itself informative.
IBM: Starling (2029) — 200 logical qubits, 100 million gates; Blue Jay (post-2033) — 2,000 logical qubits
Projection — roadmap targetIBM's published path: Loon (2025) demonstrates qLDPC architecture elements; Kookaburra (2026) the first fault-tolerant module; Cockatoo (2027) entanglement between modules; Starling (2029) a full system executing 100 million gates on 200 logical qubits; Blue Jay (after 2033) one billion operations on 2,000 logical qubits.
Quantinuum: Sol (2027) then Apollo (2029) — universal, fully fault-tolerant
Projection — roadmap targetQuantinuum's roadmap names Sol for 2027 (trap chip 'back from fabrication and advancing through product validation' as of 2026) and Apollo for 2029, described as 'fully fault-tolerant and universal', with 'hundreds of logical qubits' by 2030.
IonQ: 2,000,000 physical / 80,000 logical qubits by 2030
Projection — roadmap targetIonQ's roadmap page lists 12 logical qubits in 2026, 10,000 physical / 800 logical in 2027, 20,000 physical / 1,600 logical in 2028, and 2,000,000 physical / 80,000 logical in 2030 at 99.99% physical fidelity. These are the most aggressive public targets in the industry and should be read as such.
PsiQuantum: first 'utility-scale, fault-tolerant' machine in Brisbane by end of 2027; Chicago to follow
Projection — roadmap targetAnnounced in April 2024 with AU$940M in Australian federal and state backing; a second site in Chicago was announced with a US$760M Illinois commitment. Photonic architecture; no intermediate logical-qubit results have been published on the scale of the milestones above.